The internet dating paradox
by Rebecca Burn-Callander - Tuesday, 4th March 2008 -
“If we’re successful, people leave,” says Jason Stockwood, MD of Match.com. “That’s a tough business model”
Over 170,000 people sign up to Match.com every month. It’s free to become a member, but to receive emails, see who’s checking you out and take advantage of the service’s nifty algorithms that match you with your perfect partner, you have to subscribe.
It’s hardly a king’s ransom: £22 for a month, £65 for six months, but as business models go, it’s a tricky one: 40 per cent of members who cancel their subscription to the £175m-turnover site do so because they have found love. That equates to a loss of around 500,000 subscribers worldwide per year.
Love don’t cost a thing? Actually, our rudimentary maths says it costs Match around £4m a year! And the better Match gets at making matches, the harder it is to hold on to subscribers.
But it’s not as clear cut as all that, says Stockwood: “When we lose a member to love, we’re gaining a brand advocate. When people are successful on the site, they usually tell everyone. Then all their friends sign up. It’s a snowball effect.”
Example: A bride recently announced at her wedding that she’d met her new husband over Match.com.
The next day, all the bridesmaids signed up.
Picture source
WHAT NEXT?
Sign up for our newsletter and get our weekly pick of business news in your inbox!
Subscribe to our magazine for in depth interviews and advice from leading entrepreneurs!
Join our forum and talk business with other entrepreneurs!
Related tags: match, find your perfect match, love business, internet dating, perfect partner, find love, find love online, match.com, finding love online, internet love, online dating, love,
BUSINESS NEWS >>
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - July 03, 2009 11:28am GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - July 02, 2009 4:43pm GMT
By Catherine Woods - July 02, 2009 4:33pm GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - July 02, 2009 4:22pm GMT
By Catherine Woods - July 02, 2009 4:06pm GMT
BUSINESS COMMENT >>
By Catherine Woods - July 03, 2009 2:35pm GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - July 01, 2009 1:12pm GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - June 22, 2009 2:54pm GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - June 12, 2009 12:16pm GMT
By Rebecca Burn-Callander - June 05, 2009 12:14pm GMT







